|
Author | Topic: Chae Chan Ping v. US (Read 110 times) |
Some guy New Member
 member is offline
Joined: Oct 2003 Gender: Male  Posts: 79
|  | Chae Chan Ping v. US « Thread Started on Nov 4, 2003, 1:56pm » | |
Chae Chan Ping was not allowed back in America because of a new law or act that was created against the Chinese. He was already living in America; he left to visit his family back in Hong Kong. When he returned to America he was not allowed to stay because of the new law, even with his certificate that proved he was already living in America. I think that there was too much racism started by the white people in the past. They have discriminated all other races because they feared all other races and change.
| |
|
jennyY Full Member
   member is offline
Don't cry because it is over,smile because it happened.
Joined: Oct 2003 Gender: Female  Posts: 258
|  | Re: Chae Chan Ping v. US « Reply #1 on Nov 4, 2003, 5:44pm » | |
Chae Chan Ping left for China in 1875 and was not allow to re-enter America because of a new law.He thought that it was unfair because America and China were alies. While Chae Chan Ping went back to China he carried something called a certificate which allows him to re-enter America. However, since there's a new law on the role, he wasn't allow in. this is related to our big question of the year because Chinese people were discriminated and there were laws preventing Chinese people from coming to the U.S
| "When one door of happiness closes, another opens; but often we look so long at the close door that we do not see the one that has been opened for us." -Helen Keller |
|
Cookie-Monster Full Member
   member is offline
i forgot my cookie
Joined: Oct 2003 Gender: Female  Posts: 255 Location: Bronx
|  | Re: Chae Chan Ping v. US « Reply #2 on Nov 4, 2003, 10:26pm » | |
An immigrant that had made it to America, by the name of Chae Chan Ping, wanted to go back to China in the 1870's, but was not allowed to go back to America due to the new law, the Chinese Exclusion Act. Although he carried a Certificate that gave him perimssion to re-enter america, he was still not allowed to enter again. This is an act of discrimination, that is why it is related to the big question.
| Hey people guess who i like damn i swear ur nosey |
|
katy Senior Member
    member is offline
![[avatar]](http://kckqoo.250free.com/stuff/8.gif)
Joined: Oct 2003 Gender: Female  Posts: 702
|  | Re: Chae Chan Ping v. US « Reply #3 on Nov 4, 2003, 11:18pm » | |
Chae Chan Ping was a legal immigrant in the US, he got a certificate which allowed to re-enter the US and he leave to go back to China for a visit. After his visit, he decided to go back to US but because of the new law, he couldn't. America clearly wanted to get rid of the Chinese bit by bit and Chae Chan Ping was one of the unlucky ones. This is related to our Big Question of the year because this is an act of racism against the Chinese and they couldn't fight back.
http://www.augustana.edu/Users/Podehnel/cases/CHINEXCL.htm
|
![[image]](http://hw-driver-bal.nctu.net:52833/pub/slime/mail0826/mail5/20031222-1.gif) it's the bike king! |
|
LindaC Full Member
   member is offline
![[avatar]](http://www.angelfire.com/blog/qrntea/Bubblegum_Cutie.gif)
life's a bitch *sighs* chewin bubblegum is better xP
Joined: Oct 2003 Gender: Female  Posts: 309 Location: New York City
|  | Re: Chae Chan Ping v. US « Reply #4 on Nov 5, 2003, 6:10pm » | |
This relates to the big question because it shows discrimination of the Chinese by not letting immigrants enter America. There were many laws passed against the Chinese, not allowing them to re-enter if they leave. This Chinese name Chae Chan Ping was a one of the victims who couldn't get back to California, it was The Exclusion Act taken place in the year 1888. Even though he had a license/certificate that was going to allow him to come back. But they changed the law.
http://www.augustana.edu/Users/Podehnel/cases/CHINEXCL.htm
| <~Linda~>------> <3 tA u alL |
|
CalvinH Full Member
   member is offline
![[avatar]](http://www.ciadvertising.org/studies/student/99_spring/theory/eileen/harper/images/middle-finger.gif)
Too Sexy
Joined: Oct 2003 Gender: Male  Posts: 252 Location: Manhatten
|  | Re: Chae Chan Ping v. US « Reply #5 on Nov 5, 2003, 6:51pm » | |
A very important court case, I will tell you about is the Chae Chan Ping vs. U.S. This case happened in 1888. This case is about this Chinese man named Ping who lived in America. However, he decided to go back to China and stay there for a while. America didn’t let him in anymore because the “Chinese Exclusion Act” was still on. He fought for his right to come back to America. However, he lost the case. A very different law you will be looking at is, the Page Law. This law was passed in 1875. This was an excuse law to ban Asian women to come into America because they thought that they might come for prostitution. It prevented women to come, so it also forced men to go back home too.
| yo, yo, yo, word life |
|
BellaL New Member
 member is offline
minding my own business....
Joined: Oct 2003 Gender: Female  Posts: 21
|  | Re: Chae Chan Ping v. US « Reply #6 on Nov 5, 2003, 7:04pm » | |
Chae Chan Ping is someone who was not allowed to go back to California on 9/7/1888 because of a new law that was passed. Even though he showed his certificate or permit that says he was a citizen or someone that lived in America before, the officers at the bay would not let him and the ship land. He would have to go somewhere else on the ship. I think this event is related to the Big Question because he was discriminated for being a Chinese. Maybe the officers just wanted to play him or just don't want anymore Chinese in their land.
| |
|
BrianL Full Member
   member is offline
![[avatar]](http://www.chinapage.com/yen4.gif)
if anyone has anything against the dragon... they'll have to answer to me... i think u know why...
Joined: Oct 2003 Gender: Male  Posts: 506 Location: NY
|  | Re: Chae Chan Ping v. US « Reply #7 on Nov 5, 2003, 7:55pm » | |
Chae Chan Ping is a good example of how the Chinese were being discriminated simply of their race. Chae Chan Ping was a regular Chinese immigrant, as usual, he was being discriminated because he was chinese. When Chae Chang Ping went to China to visit his family, the law forbidding any chinese immigrant to come to america was enacted. When he tried to get back to america, he couldn't and was sent back to his home country. He didn't even have the chance to have time to react that he was leaving the "Land of Oppurtunity" for good.
| Brian |
|
SciPhygirl Junior Member
  member is offline
I've got no freedom (all chained up)
Joined: Oct 2003 Gender: Female  Posts: 188
|  | Re: Chae Chan Ping v. US « Reply #8 on Nov 5, 2003, 8:07pm » | |
http://www.tourolaw.edu/patch/Chae/ Chae Chan Ping was an Chinese immigrant that couldn't go back to California after a new law was passed. When someone goes back to their home country for a visit, then comes back to America, they wouldn't be allowed back in. That's what happened to Chae Chan Ping. He went back to China to visit his family, then came back and wasn't allowed back in. Even though he showed them his certificate that says that he was a citizen in America, he wasn't allowed back in. He was then deported back to China, without knowing before that the Acts/laws about the Chinese Immigration was passed.
| isn't this just great?! wut are UUUUU looking at? |
|
j0ycE Full Member
   member is offline
![[avatar]](http://members.shaw.ca/csmlee/cels/ccs-kerosuppi01a.jpg)
soo CUTEEEE....heheheheheeee
Joined: Oct 2003 Gender: Female  Posts: 522 Location: MAT [DUH!!!]
|  | Re: Chae Chan Ping v. US « Reply #9 on Nov 5, 2003, 8:42pm » | |
Chae Chan Ping was a Chinese Immigrants who left America. He was supposed to be allowed in America when he wants to come back, since he got the papers and stuff that said that he had the right to be allowed back in America. But the government rejected him. I think that the government did that because he is a Chinese Immigrant. The government is racist and want to get rid of the Chinese Immigrants. This have to do with our Big Question because Chae Chan Ping was discriminated against for being who he was. It is not fair; it is not Chae Chan Ping's fault to be a Chinese Immigrant and to be discriminated against. It is the government¡¦s fault because they were all racist.
Site: http://www.augustana.edu/Users/Podehnel/cases/CHINEXCL.htm
| ...by mEe aka j0ycE!!! |
|
davichen New Member
 member is offline
Joined: Oct 2003 Gender: Male  Posts: 87
|  | Re: Chae Chan Ping v. US « Reply #10 on Nov 5, 2003, 8:45pm » | |
Hi. 
Chan Ping was a Chinese Immigrant to travel to the US with a legal document saying that he was allowed into the US because he lives there. But due to the laws in the US, he was forbidden to enter the US. This is due to the racists laws made by the US government.
| |
|
susanM Full Member
   member is offline
Joined: Oct 2003 Gender: Female  Posts: 368 Location: New York
|  | Re: Chae Chan Ping v. US « Reply #11 on Nov 5, 2003, 9:53pm » | |
Although the Certificate of Eligibility was in the hands of Chae Chan Ping, he was not allowed back into America for the fact that he was Asian. The Chinese exclusion Act has prohibited him from entering therefore he was taken to court. Chae Chan Ping~{!/~}s case was related to the Big Question because he was not allowed back into America even when he had the Certificate of approval for him to pass because of his race. He struggled back by begging for Habeas Corpus and was granted at last and was sent to court.
| |
|
Jordan thesexy1 New Member
 member is offline
SeXy BeAst
Joined: Oct 2003 Gender: Male  Posts: 95
|  | Re: Chae Chan Ping v. US « Reply #12 on Nov 5, 2003, 9:55pm » | |
MAny immigrants lke Chae Chan Ping were discrimanted in the us. For example he went out of the state to visit family and there was a part on his passport that said he was living in America but when he tried to come back he couldnt because of a new law they passed by not letting chinese immigrants going baq home to see there parents.
| SeXy BeAst |
|
Staria Senior Member
    member is offline
![[avatar]](http://esperne.dewdrop-garden.com/yuna-layout.gif)
Joined: Oct 2003 Gender: Female  Posts: 701
|  | Re: Chae Chan Ping v. US « Reply #13 on Nov 5, 2003, 10:19pm » | |
The Chae Chan Ping v. US is related to our big question for the year because it¡¦s a form of intolerance. When he left of China in 1875 there was no law against him leaving then coming back. But while he was away the government passed a new law [exclusion act] and that prevented Chae Chan Ping from coming back to America even though he had a certificated proving that he can use to come back to America. This is an example of how the Chinese were being treated during this period of time. Even the government are going against the Chinese totally ignoring the declaration¡¦s purpose [all men are created equal]. He was discriminated/oppressed simply because of his race. http://www.tourolaw.edu/patch/Chae/
| x3 staria x3 |
|
Yan¡ÓBin New Member
 member is offline
![[avatar]](http://www.starblvd.com/david6936/CD/imagesCD/CDD060.jpg)
bored~
Joined: Oct 2003 Gender: Female  Posts: 82 Location: NY
| |
|